• “Trump’s appointment of Bolton raises concern in Asia”: Oh, Really?

    The above is Friday’s headline in the New York Times. One would believe that appointing John Bolton the president’s national security advisor was as dangerous […]

  • 70 Million Brace for Nor’Easter; 300 Million Relaxing Behind Flat Screens

    Is the weather Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative, right-wing or leftist? Of course the weather is inevitably what it is wherever it is happening […]

  • Is Stephen Colbert Smart? Yes. Is He Funny? Definitely Not

    My wife listens to Stephen Colbert quite often. She laughs hilariously at his wit, his lack of charm, his neurotic fast paced shouting style all […]

  • Kurdish Afrin Falls to Turkey

    Turkish Government Official: “Europe Will Be Muslim” by Uzay Bulut Turkey Islamized northern Cyprus through a military invasion in 1974. To Islamize the much more […]

  • Listening to the NPR Morning Report on the Fighting in Yemen, and Wondering…?

    Yemen has been a lawless, governmentless state for as long as I can recall — and I am 68. There is a revolution going on […]



In the early evening of March 22, President Trump announced a truly magnificent personnel shift in the White House: the decision to appoint former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton as National Security Advisor in the stead of Lieutenant General H. R. MacMaster, an official often criticized by supporters of the president as a “globalist” tied closely with the Establishment-run Council on Foreign Relations. Bolton first distinguished himself in 1991 while spearheading the first Bush administration’s successful efforts to have the infamous 1975 U.N. resolution 3379 declaring Zionism a form of “racism” repealed. Ever since then, he has distinguished himself as not only a warrior for Israel, but an astute expert on the Middle East and the threat of Iran, offering sage evidence disproving the lies put forward by advocates for the Obama administration’s catastrophic 2015 deal with the Islamic Republic. An articulate and principled conservative, Bolton will likely serve the interests of the American people, President Trump, and the State of Israel quite satisfactorily. Moving the White House’s influence away from the Establishment, CFR strategies which have failed to confront America’s most dangerous enemies in the past, and moving towards a more responsible, peace-through-strength, Reaganesque foreign policy. (February 24, 2017, Gage Skidmore / Wikipedia Commons)
When the young man (who shall remain unnamed and never pictured) was “revealed” by the mainstream media as some sort of “conservative” on March 21, conservatism’s PR problems would appear to be dire. Nevertheless, despite what “The New York Times” might gurgle — unlike Islam — conservatism is the philosophy of the conservation of human happiness and liberty. This — unlike Islam — not only includes, but puts to the forefront, the protection of the innocent and the succor of the wronged. Some of the media and elites’ reactions to the now-deceased bomber’s negative attitude to abortion have supposedly cast him as yet another “right-wing” anti-abortion terrorist. There have been only 8 deadly acts of anti-abortion terrorism committed by so-called “conservatives,” between 1993 and 2015, resulting in the deaths of 11 people. Both numbers are too many, but as of March 22, there have been 32,764 acts of Jihād committed by Muslims since September 11, 2001, with 183 people killed in 38 incidents between March 10 and 16, 2018 alone. There is no outrage from those powerful people and organizations who cannot gain from telling the truth about Islam, yet they ramble on about the Austin bomber reflecting some conservative points of view, as if they would care if he were a Bernie Sanders socialist — let alone a Muslim who has read and understands what Islam’s most important sources say. (March 12, 2018, Ricardo B. Brazziell / “Austin American-Statesman” via AP)
As the flowers of spring come nearer, feminists can reflect upon all the things which the understandable depression of the winter season has prevented them bringing into the sunlight of public outrage. In the case of people for whom rape can be defined as anything from an awkward compliment to regrets over bouts of voluntary promiscuity, one would imagine that little girls in faraway lands being married before they know what a trimester is, would be among the things which feminists are presumed to professionally expose. Alas, the regularity of Tamika Mallory, Linda Sarsour, and Gloria Steinem’s well-paid speaking engagements crowds out their ability to actually talk about things which would make them real rather than pretend humanitarian heroines. According to none other than the government Registry Office of the Islamic Republic of Iran, between 2013 and 2016 alone, there were 148,670 marriages of Iranian girls below the age of 15 — approximately 1-in-20 of the total marriages recorded during that period. And that statistic does not even include those under 19. One would think that the little brown girls against whom any aggression whatsoever, we are told, is always racist would be at the top of’s list of “feminist” priorities. But since nearly 150,000 little girls are being raped into oblivion every day because of a 5-letter word no one is allowed to say, Linda Sarsour suddenly doesn’t have the ovaries to talk about it. (Graphic: Aynaz Anni Cyrus and Steven Mix)
Yet another deranged shooter has defiled a school, this time in Lexington Park, Maryland. Yet what has been buried in the media’s mindless commentary is that the shooter is no longer murdering his classmates because of an armed police officer. Guns apparently cause murder, but they also stop murder. Why is this? “I’m confused; you’re not making sense,” a Don Lemon-type genius might say. But the relevant fool will say that partially because to admit that virtuous people with guns can stop evil people with guns makes well-meaning liberal fascists of this type unnecessary. Why would anyone need a petition for Congress to designate the NRA as a terrorist organization if an armed populace actually creates a safer society? Why, in the end, does gun control work so well in a Democrat’s mind and not on planet Earth? (March 20, 2018, Jim Watson / Agence France-Presse via Getty Images)
The Dow Jones plunged more than 700 points on Thursday, March 22, after President Trump’s new tariffs on China began to take effect. De-regulated yet still protectionist economic policies were one of the major planks in the president’s “America First” campaign agenda — one which garnered much of his blue-collar (traditionally Democratic) voters in states with once-booming manufacturing industries. Tariffs and protectionism have proved time and again to be economically disastrous — as in the years before the Great Depression — and antithetical to the Reaganesque free market economic policies which produce wealth for the non-rich. Will President Trump double down on his campaign promises, in order to maintain much of his voter base for the next two elections, or will he take the much more courageous step of seeing the economic consequences of his proposed policies, and move towards free market, fully de-regulated policies? (March 22, 2018, Graphic: Google)
Major corruption allegations have surfaced against Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), as well as his wife Elaine Chao, the current Secretary of Transportation. McConnell is correctly identified with much of the “swamp” atmosphere permeating Washington, impeding both the conservative movement and President Trump’s agenda. “Mitch McConnell should be removed for all the reasons I’ve said before, but especially now, as majority leader,” said conservative talk radio and media titan Mark Levin on the evening of Wednesday, March 21. “And there ought to be an ethics investigation looking into his background. And I am damn serious about it.” The departure of McConnell from the political scene — let alone leadership of the Senate — is sorely required for the defeat of not only the Democrat-run “deep state,” but the Republican Establishment, which has sought to sabotage Donald Trump at every turn, but also the reformist efforts of staunchly conservative senators such as Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Mike Lee (R-UT). Whether the allegations will result in his final ejection from power is unanswerable at the moment. (July 26, 2017, Carolyn Kaster / AP)
The White House has announced to Congress that it plans to approve a $1 billion arms sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, including around 6,700 American-made anti-tank missiles. This development has been announced on the heels of Crowned Prince Muḥammad ibn Salmān’s meeting with President Trump as part of the prince’s tour of the United States. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told the prince that “Saudi Arabia was ‘part of the solution’ in Yemen, where the Saudis are leading a U.S.-backed military campaign against Houthi rebels that has been heavily criticized for inflicting civilian casualties,” Fox News reports. The question is, what will the repercussions be for the United States continuing to arm one of the most morally backward and repellent regimes on earth? The Iranian-backed Shī’ah Ḥūthī rebellion does threaten to create a toe-hold for Iran in territory not very far from Israel; but propping up a government which partially facilitated the infamy of 9/11 should still be approached with great care. Saudi Arabia, as well as coming to awkward agreements with Israel, is also making oil deals with predatory Russia, its aging king Salmān ibn Abd al-Azīz al-Sa‘ūd receiving (pictured) guards of honor in Moscow. The deals allow Russia even greater influence in the Middle East — and Russia is an ally of Iran. President Trump, General Mattis, and others should think very carefully about calling this crumbling yet cruel monarchy “part of the solution,” in Yemen or anywhere else. Standing up to Saudi Arabia — whose financial influence has, in only one instance, been poisoning American universities with anti-Jewish and anti-American propaganda for decades — should, even in the face of the Iranian menace, be a major foreign policy priority for the Trump administration — one which could truly earn history’s awe. (October 4, 2017, Ivan Syekryetaryev / AP)


Subscribe to Receive E-Mails

Enter your email address to receive new articles by email.


Aynaz Anni Cyrus (April 14, 2016, Facebook); Rachel Maddow (November 9, 2016, MSNBC); Ashley Judd (January 21, 2017, Theo Wargo / Getty Images); Scarlett Johansson (February 26, 2017, Valerie Macon / Agence France-Presse via Getty Images); Bob Bland, Tamika D. Mallory, Carmen Perez, and Linda Sarsour (April 25, 2017, Charles Sykes / Invision via AP)


How Leftists are Acting Exactly as Islam’s Followers

by Aynaz Anni Cyrus

I am a very proud American, and I can officially say that I have spent more time in America than I did in my homeland of Iran. America is my home. But I watch the left in America literally and openly reinforcing the attack on America and our only ally in the Middle East, Israel, by calling for it to be wiped away.

The reason I say the leftists are hyper-focused on Islamization is that nearly everything they do and promote today concerns Islam, facilitating an Islamic government, and Islamic countries which are all aimed at taking down American society as we know it, and wiping Israel off the map. The left literally has the same slogan, whether they want to believe it or not. “Take America down and wipe Israel off the map!” For the love of God, they kick people out of your rallies who carry a flag that represents Israel. And then they have the audacity to walk around saying that they are all about love and tolerance and we need to coexist while at the same time ousting those who don’t do what you tell them to do. That’s not how people coexist! You tell me how that works!

In order to get the bigger picture, let’s go back in time ourselves for a bit.

In the Islamic Republic of Iran before 1979, Iran was called the “Mini America.” If you Google Iran before 1979, you begin to realize women were very Westernized then. Women wore skirts and tank tops; were able to wear make-up and there was no hijab; women were teachers, and we had women in every position of government. It was very beautiful. Freedom! You could be whatever you wanted to be. You want to be Muslim? You could be Muslim! You want to be Christian? You could practice the Christian faith! Jewish? You bet! You could be whatever you wanted to be as long as you didn’t bother other people and infringe on their rights.

Sadly, and tragically, in 1979 Ayatollah Khomeini came in to power in Iran, hijacked the revolution, and turned the country into an Islamic country, with the first mandate being that all women must wear the hijab. Mandatory!

He wasn’t making anything up; it’s in the Qur’an (24:31).

Here’s where it got interesting: Some of the women felt that no government had the right to come in and tell them what they could or could not do, and what they could or could not wear. They resisted this order and here is what happened: The Supreme Court, which is a Shariah court, simply ordered a new law be passed:

You wear the hijab, or we force you to wear it, or there would be dire consequences.

Case in point: After the new mandate went into effect, if a woman was walking down the street without a hijab the police would stop her and pin the hijab to her forehead with a safety pin. Literally. Pin it to the skin of her forehead. This not a story. This if fact.

If a woman was not wearing full-length pants, if she dared have a dress or skirt on, she would suffer a fate like one straight out of the once-popular competition television show Fear Factor. Only this was no volunteer competition to win cash and prizes. This was a reality that would be someone’s worse nightmare; they would forcibly grab their leg and shove it in a bag of live cockroaches. That is what they did to my people! No one dared walk out of their apartment without a full hijab.

Next came the order that woman cannot wear make-up; Shariah enforcers would have napkins or cloth with them and wipe the lipstick or make-up off any women they saw who dared wear this in public. Sounds not as bad as cockroaches, right? But the cloth was laced with acid. They were not just getting rid of your lipstick, they were getting rid of your lips. The government! Khomeini, the Supreme Leader, allowed women to be tortured by the police with acid! To remove lipstick!

These people are ruthless, they have absolutely no code of honor. They don’t care! This is how they took over my country.

Now some may argue that this was several decades ago, and that is not happening now. Wrong! Let’s fast-forward to my life and my story:

I was walking home from school with a friend of mine. We were walking and whispering because we were not supposed to be loud, and all of a sudden I felt my head being jerked backwards and heard a single sound of a snip. I turned and saw a Shariah enforcement woman holding my hair. She literally cut off my hair! As we were walking a bit of my hair accidentally had fallen lower than my scarf and it was showing from under my hijab. She grabbed it, cut it with a scissors and I could not say a word. I stood there watching the woman standing there with my hair in her hands and I could not say a word. But inside, I said, “Screw you, I will regrow my hear.” (I never let Shariah take me, I resisted as much as possible silently in my heart; it was my only means of survival.) That’s how they do it! They break you into submission!

Now we have Linda Sarsour, Madonna, Ashley Judd, Scarlett Johansson, who are just dying to go to the Middle East because women have so many rights; who are so oppressed here in America under this beautiful United States flag. Who are so worried about women’s rights.

I dare you to go to the Middle East, go to Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar; any of these countries, and I dare you, Ashely Judd, to be a nasty woman in any of those countries. I dare you! See what happens. You won’t be able to see another day of being a nasty woman.

So in reality, let’s cut the crap. What are you looking for? More rights? Obviously, you have no idea what not having rights means. I do. That is why I am holding on tight. That is why I wake up every day thinking what else can I teach my fellow humans? What more can I do? Anything to keep what happened in my country from never happening here!

You have no idea what it means to be oppressed. Not a clue! When you were nine-years-old, no one came told you, “Hey, by the way, starting tomorrow you will become an adult! You will have to start behaving as an adult with all responsibilities. You must begin to follow the laws of Mohammad, fight in the name of Allah, be willing to die in the name of Allah, and, your daddy can sell you to whomever comes or pays for you first.”

The Madonnas and Ashely Judds of this world should just be ashamed, and go get a life. Go be an activist with a movement where you actually know what you are talking about! If you are not going to help us fight for our freedom just get out of the away. Leave!

Yes, this message is going out to all you women who claim to be so oppressed by President Trump!

Yes, I am calling you out: women like Whoopie Goldberg, Linda Sarsour, Madonna, Ashley Judd, Scarlett Johansson.

You are not happy here? Then Google a country with a president you like and go there.

Just go! You are taking an entire country down because you are not happy with President Trump?

Let’s for a minute not care about Shariah, ISIS, Khomeini, or terror attacks; let’s not even care about the prophet of Islam. Put it all aside, let’s go to the root. Go ahead read — the Qur’an.

I have said it before, when describing Shariah and Islam, that they are like a time machine. But instead of going forward, however, we go backward 1,400 years. They come and they conquer and, boom, we find ourselves all the way back to the Stone Age! What the left is doing is much the same.

The media’s attitude is of “Let’s not talk about Israel and the good they represent,” and “Let’s not talk bad about Islam because Muslims are getting their feelings hurt,” while the next moment the followers of Islam go blow up things and kill people. And we can’t be critical of that? Don’t talk bad about Antifa because then they go destroy property and hurt people. So, I guess we should hand over our freedom and future…

This isn’t me being brave; this isn’t me being courageous. This is me being terrified. I fight because I am terrified of those days coming back to me. I breath for this fight because I love the freedom that I earned.